[argyllcms] Re: Weighted averaged source gamuts
- From: Beisch Clemens <clemens.beisch@xxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 22:32:42 +0200
Am 31.07.2007 um 21:25 schrieb H. Teeuwen:
From a conceptual point of view, wouldn't it be better to implement
a curve in such profiles, that mimics the behavior of the printer,
instead of an L* curve?
Best regards,
Herman
Hallo,
we are talking about perceptual rendering.
Most of the time users are having souce images which are in one of
the common RGB workingspaces.
The task of the perceptual rendering intent is to transfer source
images to a destination with a different gamut size (most of the time
smaler).
The resulting image should mimic the source image as good as possible
without a visual clipping.
That's why the Online Profiler is using these three presets.
I can't see any benefit to mimic the behavior of a printer at this
point, except you are talking about device to device conversion and
this is a
good task for a device link ICC.
If you have another question about the Online Profiler, don't
hesitate to use our forum ;-)
Best regards,
Clemens Beisch
========================================
colorXact - colors are coming home!
Public BETA of the first online ICC profiling software
register for free
http://www.colorxact.eu
========================================
- References:
- [argyllcms] Re: Weighted averaged source gamuts
- From: H. Teeuwen
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Weighted averaged source gamuts
- » [argyllcms] Re: Weighted averaged source gamuts
- » [argyllcms] Re: Weighted averaged source gamuts
- » [argyllcms] Re: Weighted averaged source gamuts
- » [argyllcms] Re: Weighted averaged source gamuts
Best regards, Herman
- [argyllcms] Re: Weighted averaged source gamuts
- From: H. Teeuwen