[argyllcms] True Separation and TAC for icclink
- From: colortaxi <burckhart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 13:38:10 +0100
Hello list!
using icclink with the -kt -l 280 options for ISOcoated.icc in and
ISOuncoated.icc out does not have any effect on my conversions with a
test file. I don't have a reverse lookup for the separation I'm
beginning with and get rich black for my output. C=0 M=0 Y=0 K=100
leads to C=76.32 M=67.87 Y=57.39 K=83.18 when I check the conversion
with icctrans of lcms. Same result in Photoshop when I convert a
testfile.tiff with an applescript for color conversion using my
devicelink called ISOlink4.icc which I calculated with icclink. It
adds to more than 280% covering out of 100% in the beginning. So with
all other rich colors of the testfile. Here's the line I wrote:
$ icclink -v -l 280 -kt ISOcoated.icc ISOuncoated.icc ISOlink4.icc
Am I wrong with it?
Burckhart Seifert
www.colortaxi.de
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: True Separation and TAC for icclink
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: True Separation and TAC for icclink
- From: Graeme Gill
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] True Separation and TAC for icclink
- » [argyllcms] Re: True Separation and TAC for icclink
- » [argyllcms] Re: True Separation and TAC for icclink
- » [argyllcms] Re: True Separation and TAC for icclink
- » [argyllcms] Re: True Separation and TAC for icclink
- [argyllcms] Re: True Separation and TAC for icclink
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: True Separation and TAC for icclink
- From: Graeme Gill