[argyllcms] Re: Support of v4 device link profile in cctiff
- From: Roger Breton <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 22:40:01 -0500
> There's little or no advantage in v4 device link profiles technically,
> so the most compatible thing to do is to generate v2 profiles.
>
> Graeme Gill.
Granted. But I am not the author of this v4 DLP that I'd like to put through
its pace, and I can't find any utilities to run conversions with :(
Regards,
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Support of v4 device link profile in cctiff
- From: Graeme Gill
- References:
- [argyllcms] Re: Support of v4 device link profile in cctiff
- From: Graeme Gill
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Support of v4 device link profile in cctiff
- » [argyllcms] Re: Support of v4 device link profile in cctiff
- » [argyllcms] Re: Support of v4 device link profile in cctiff
- » [argyllcms] Re: Support of v4 device link profile in cctiff
- » [argyllcms] Re: Support of v4 device link profile in cctiff
- » [argyllcms] Re: Support of v4 device link profile in cctiff
- [argyllcms] Re: Support of v4 device link profile in cctiff
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: Support of v4 device link profile in cctiff
- From: Graeme Gill