[argyllcms] Re: Support of v4 device link profile in cctiff

Roger Breton wrote:
> Hi Graeme,
>
> I encoutered a situation where support of v4 device link profiles are not
> supported by cctiff. Are these v4 DLPs very different from v2 DLPs? I was
> tempted to modify the header to force cctiff to honor a v4 DLP but I shied
> away from it.
>   

The most relevant difference is probably that V4 offers new LUT types,
which a V4 profile may use, but which are not understood by a V2 CMM.

Regards,
Gerhard

> Regards,
>
> Roger Breton  |  Laval, Canada  |  graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
>
>
>
>

Other related posts: