[argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:34:56 +1000
Volker Sauer wrote:
This is exactly my experience. RPM is really crap when it comes to
upgrading. APT/DEB does the job a lot better.
You might be right - I'm not much of an "upgrade" type of person,
I much prefer to leave things if they work, rather than upsetting
the apple cart by upgrading all the time.
I'm running about 30 servers with Debian Stable.
I think the problem I had was that Debian simply wouldn't
run on any hardware I could buy, since it wasn't keeping
up with it. It seems as if you would have to buy a machine
12 months in advance of wanting to use it, if you want
to run Debian :-)
Graeme Gill.
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- From: Guy K. Kloss
- [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- From: Nicolas Mailhot
- References:
- [argyllcms] Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- From: L
- [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- From: Guy K. Kloss
- [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- From: Volker Sauer
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- » [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- » [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- » [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- » [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- » [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- » [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- » [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- » [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- » [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- » [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- » [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- » [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
This is exactly my experience. RPM is really crap when it comes to upgrading. APT/DEB does the job a lot better.
- [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- From: Guy K. Kloss
- [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- From: Nicolas Mailhot
- [argyllcms] Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- From: L
- [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- From: Guy K. Kloss
- [argyllcms] Re: Spyder2 with Argyll V1.0.1 vs V0.70 (BETA 8)
- From: Volker Sauer