[argyllcms] Re: Spectroradiometric measurements
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 14:12:35 +1000
Roger Breton wrote:
Once you have the data in 5nm or 10nm form, then it is straigthforward to
compute tristimulus values.
The Argyll spectral module (xicc/xspect.c) currently does a linear
interpolation
to 1nm, and then discretely integrates at 1nm intervals. For spectra at 5nm
intervals or
better, this is (I believe) an acceptable approach. I think the CIE recommend
using a third-degree polynomial if the spectra is sampled at worse than 5nm
intervals. I've a mind to add polynomial interpolation at some stage..
Graeme Gill.
- References:
- [argyllcms] Re: Spectroradiometric measurements
- From: Roger Breton
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Spectroradiometric measurements
- » [argyllcms] Re: Spectroradiometric measurements
- » [argyllcms] Re: Spectroradiometric measurements
- » [argyllcms] Re: Spectroradiometric measurements
Once you have the data in 5nm or 10nm form, then it is straigthforward to compute tristimulus values.
The Argyll spectral module (xicc/xspect.c) currently does a linear interpolation to 1nm, and then discretely integrates at 1nm intervals. For spectra at 5nm intervals or better, this is (I believe) an acceptable approach. I think the CIE recommend using a third-degree polynomial if the spectra is sampled at worse than 5nm intervals. I've a mind to add polynomial interpolation at some stage..
- [argyllcms] Re: Spectroradiometric measurements
- From: Roger Breton