[argyllcms] Re: Spectrolino Spectroscan charrtread problem



Thanks for
the answer.



Now the Spectrolino and the SpectroScan are working correctly.



I am using Argyll 1.3.3 (I was using 1.3.2 when I reported the problem) and I
update the firmware to the latest version for both instruments, and now I don't
have problems.



Using the Pol filter I am getting “dark results”.  I have been told that this 
is normal; I’d like
to know how Argyll will work with this darker values. I made a profile with
ColorThink and I saw that the entire gamut is “moved down” to lower L* values.
I didn’t make any print test, but I suppose that the prints will look brighter
when compared with the ones from a profile made with the i1Pro (using the same
print and profile settings). What do you think about this behavior? 



Vittorio Villani




> Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 09:22:42 +1000
> From: graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Spectrolino Spectroscan charrtread problem
> 
> Vittorio Villani wrote:
> > If I try to
> > use the UV or the D65 filter I always get this error after a few reads:
> 
> > Got 'Wrong
> > Configuration' (No valid character) error.
> 
> > Do you have
> > any suggestions?
> 
> Hi,
>       do you only see this using the spectroscan ?
> It would help to capture the debug output when this happens.
> 
> So use the flag -D5 and capture the stderr - ie.
> 
>       chartread -D5 other options filename 2> log.txt
> 
> Graeme Gill.
>

Other related posts: