[argyllcms] Re: Question about dispwin -L
- From: Leonard Evens <len@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:03:10 -0500
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 09:58 +1100, Graeme Gill wrote:
> Leonard Evens wrote:
> > Under Fedora 9 Linux, if I understand correctly,
> >
> > dispwin -I cal/profile
> >
> > (a) loads the designated calibration into the video LUT and sets the ICC
> > atom in X to the appropriate profile. (b) It also copies the indicated
> > file to
> > ~/.local/share/color/icc/devices/display
> >
> > dispwin -L
> >
> > does (a). But my
> > ~/.local/share/color/icc/devices/display
> > directory contains copies of every profile I have used.
>
> Right. They'll stay there until you uninstall them using -U
>
> > How does dispwin -L know which one of them to use?
>
> Because it's recorded the association between the profile
> and the display in the file ~/.config/color.jcnf
Thanks for the information.
I don't understand how to use
dispwin -U
I've tried all sorts of ways to specify the profile as an argument to
the command, but I keep error messages.
>
> See <http://www.argyllcms.com/doc/ucmm.html>
>
> It's not likely anything other than Argyll uses this
> convention though. Applications should really just be
> looking for the appropriate atom:
> <http://www.burtonini.com/computing/x-icc-profiles-spec-0.2.html>
> that dispwin -L will create.
>
> > I ask this question because it seems clear that eye of gnome and gimp
> > are showing different things although both supposedly use the
> > calibration/profiling information, and I am trying to figure out why. I
> > believe that eog should be using color management because I checked the
> > source code. gimp and inkscape show exactly the same thing so I am
> > confident they are doing what they should.
>
> Sorry, no idea.
>
> Graeme Gill.
Other related posts: