On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Philip Pemberton <philpem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/07/10 16:08, Pascal de Bruijn wrote: >> >> Now, I should have done my homework better before sending these images >> (I can't cancel them anymore), but it seems Minilabs are actually >> real RGB devices? Can anybody confirm this? Should I have used Video >> RGB? > > Depends on the minilab. > > Dry-labs like the new HP boxen are basically inkjet printers: CMYK devices > which print onto rolls of photo paper. Dye-sublimation type dry-labs use wax > instead, but they're still CMYK. The jury's still out as to whether they're > any good for pro use, but AIUI most pro-photogs won't touch them with a > bargepole. > > Wet-labs like the Fuji Frontier series are based on an RGB laser assembly > and print onto normal colour photographic paper. The RGB produces a C/M/Y > pattern on the paper (it's negative acting) It's a Frontier as far as I know (FOTO.com). But if I understand correctly, having CMY steps instead of RGB steps would be correct, right? Regards, Pascal de Bruijn