[argyllcms] Re: Profiling a Minilab

From: Pascal de Bruijn <pmjdebruijn@xxxxxxxxx>
To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2010 12:57:20 +0200

On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> edmund ronald wrote:
>>
>> minilabs are rgb devices; and there's no point in so many patches, a
>> few hundred are ok. But I would recommend a single sheet.
>
> If it's a passive media with three colorants, then by
> definition it's CMY. The physics won't let you do it any
> other way...
>
> [ie. while the exposure system may be RGB, the development
> inverts it, and the colorants in the film will be CMY.]

Ok, thanks for the confirmation, so I didn't screw it up...

Regards,
Pascal de Bruijn

References:

[argyllcms] Profiling a Minilab
From: Pascal de Bruijn

[argyllcms] Re: Profiling a Minilab
From: edmund ronald

[argyllcms] Re: Profiling a Minilab
From: Graeme Gill

[argyllcms] Re: Profiling a Minilab

Other related posts: