[argyllcms] Profile -r option
- From: Milton Taylor <milton.taylor@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 22:48:43 +1000
Hi Graeme,
I'm interested in finding out more about the -r option. I'm remaking my
film scanner profile, and this switch seems to have quite a dramatic
effect on the results. Leaving it off, i.e. default value, gives the
best results in terms of avg and peak dE. Going from -r 0.5 to -r 0.75
and the error doubles. At -r 1.0 it's even worse.
You indicated that the default was too low, so why select a higher -r
value if it gives a profile that is apparently not as good?
Just for info, in my case, -qh gave these results:
r = 0.25 avg dE=0.38 peak 2.8
r = 0.50 avg dE=0.48 peak 3.7
r = 0.75 avg dE=1.0 peak 7.8
r = 1.0 avg dE=1.6 peak 9.5
Which is the 'right' value of -r to use?
Cheers,
Milt
tly not as good?<br>
<br>
Just for info, in my case, -qh gave these results:<br>
r = 0.25 avg dE=0.38 peak 2.8<br>
r = 0.50 avg dE=0.48 peak 3.7<br>
r = 0.75 avg dE=1.0 peak 7.8<br>
r = 1.0 avg dE=1.6 peak 9.5<br>
<br>
Which is the 'right' value of -r to use?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Milt<br>
<br>
</font>
</body>
</html>
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Profile -r option
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Profile -r option
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profile -r option
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profile -r option
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profile -r option
- » [argyllcms] Re: Profile -r option
- [argyllcms] Re: Profile -r option
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz