[argyllcms] Re: Postscript to raster
- From: "Lars Tore Gustavsen" <lars.tore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:07:04 +0200
On 9/19/07, Lars Tore Gustavsen <> wrote:
>
> Do you think the variance above have any influence on the quality of
> the resulting profile?
>
I guess my question is not a problem at all.
Anyway I used too many hours last night to write a simple
bash/imagemagick script that parse the ti2 file and create an target
either as a 16bit rgb or 16 bit cmyk file. The cmyk version is nice
since that is the only way I can get the target as 16bit cmyk without
going thru a 8bit version.
Anyway with those targets I have the same percent value when I measure
with a pipette as in the ti2 file. If anyone tests this you need a
pretty new imagemagick to create the cmyk files. The script is very
simple so in most cases it must be edited, like when you have a
multipage target.
And if you are using cinepaint you must delete the transperancy
channel to se it in cinepaint. Like "mogrify +matte target.tif"
http://www.mulebakken.net/div/ti2image
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Postscript to raster
- From: Graeme Gill
- References:
- [argyllcms] Postscript to raster
- From: Lars Tore Gustavsen
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Postscript to raster
- » [argyllcms] Re: Postscript to raster
- » [argyllcms] Re: Postscript to raster
- [argyllcms] Re: Postscript to raster
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Postscript to raster
- From: Lars Tore Gustavsen