[argyllcms] Postscript to raster
- From: "Lars Tore Gustavsen" <lars.tore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:52:31 +0200
I am still a little confused about the rasterizing of the target.
Yesterday I downloaded a tryout version of photoshop7 and installed it
on my linux box. I have tested it against ghostscript. The results are
below. This is a RGB testchart.
First line shows the ti2 file for patch A1.
% value pixel value
77 "A1" 75.096 93.840 8.2011
gs 75.2941 94.1117 7.84314 192 240 20 8bit tif
gs856 75.0958 93.8415 8.2017 191 239 21 16bit png
ps7 74.902 93.7255 8.23529 191 239 21 8bit png
There are two tests with ghostscript. The first one is with an 8bit
driver and the second with a 16bit png driver. The last one is the
closest match to the values in the ti2 file.
I also think the pixel value of the ghostscript 8bit version is quite
interesting.
This was my first experience with photoshop. My workflow was quite
simple just open and save as png.
I have seen the same variance in colors with cmyk targets.
Do you think the variance above have any influence on the quality of
the resulting profile?
The files can be seen on
http://ltgustavsen.googlepages.com/postscript.zip (53kb)
Regards
Lars Tore Gustavsen
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Postscript to raster
- From: Lars Tore Gustavsen
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Postscript to raster
- » [argyllcms] Re: Postscript to raster
- » [argyllcms] Re: Postscript to raster
- [argyllcms] Re: Postscript to raster
- From: Lars Tore Gustavsen