[argyllcms] Re: Perceptual Source Gamut
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 22:53:03 +1000
tresorjoe@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
you might be interested in this:
http://www.brucelindbloom.com/downloads/RGB16Million.tif.zip ;)
thanks clemens, i will also try if using the -g with such an image can
increase quality of the perceptual table.
Unfortunately this should make absolutely no difference whatsoever,
since such an image exercises the whole of the gamut, defeating the
idea of the -g flag, which is to tell the gamut mapping that not
all of the source profile gamut needs to be mapped.
Graeme Gill.
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Testing RAW workflows
- From: Roger Breton
- References:
- [argyllcms] Perceptual Source Gamut
- From: Bill Birkett
- [argyllcms] Re: Perceptual Source Gamut
- From: Beisch Clemens
- [argyllcms] Re: Perceptual Source Gamut
- From: Bill Birkett
- [argyllcms] Re: Perceptual Source Gamut
- From: tresorjoe
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Perceptual Source Gamut
- » [argyllcms] Re: Perceptual Source Gamut
- » [argyllcms] Re: Perceptual Source Gamut
- » [argyllcms] Re: Perceptual Source Gamut
- » [argyllcms] Re: Perceptual Source Gamut
- » [argyllcms] Re: Perceptual Source Gamut
- » [argyllcms] Re: Perceptual Source Gamut
- [argyllcms] Testing RAW workflows
- From: Roger Breton
- [argyllcms] Perceptual Source Gamut
- From: Bill Birkett
- [argyllcms] Re: Perceptual Source Gamut
- From: Beisch Clemens
- [argyllcms] Re: Perceptual Source Gamut
- From: Bill Birkett
- [argyllcms] Re: Perceptual Source Gamut
- From: tresorjoe