On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Lars Tore Gustavsen <lars.tore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:04 AM, Pascal de Bruijn <pmjdebruijn@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> As a small side-note, this is the procedure I use to characterize my screen: >> >> http://blog.pcode.nl/2009/01/color-profiling-your-screen >> >> Regards, >> Pascal de Bruijn >> >> > > Since comments are closed in your blog I use e-mail instead. I read > that you don’t load the calibration in the end. If so, is there any > point to run dispcal at all in your case, other than to set the white > level? My thinking is that you should then drop the dispread –k > parameter, when the intension is not to load the calibration. > Your blog are by the way great and interesting reading! You have a very good point there... I assumed targen used the calfile to generate the patches... which is nonsense... So I should drop -k indeed! And not surprisingly the results get even better. I'm not loading the calibration, because it's way to bothersome. Having to load the calibration data everytime I'm going to use a color managed application. I'd rather let the application do all of the corrections. Even if it might it's slightly less accurate. In the end I'm not a professional... So don't need the highest possible accuracy... > I have actually tried to write something myself about argyllcms in my > native language (Norwegian), trying to spread colormanagment. > http://www.mulebakken.net/fargestyring/fargestyring-monitor.pdf Cool. But I won't be able to read it :) Regards, Pascal de Bruijn