[argyllcms] Monitor profiles and their (black point?) "readability"


I made some profiles and opened an image in Safari, Firefox 3, and Photoshop (Mac os 10.5.3).

Result:
Safari and Firefox renders the image almost identical
PS lights the deep shadow a little

In the same test with a i1match profile all software are in agrement.

PS renders the image almost identical with both profiles.

I deduce that not all software can read the Argyll profiles (black point question?), and only PS can read it.

Here one can download the stack with the screenshots of the three software and the profiles.

Marco

Other related posts: