Where can I get newest version of dispaygui and argyll? Thank you! Sent by AAK from iPhone 3Gs On Mar 10, 2010, at 1:36 PM, "Michel Joly de Lotbinière" <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx t> wrote: > I've always had better results on my notebook LCD panel with a 1 > channel shaper curve matrix profile. No matter what I do > (preconditioning the target patches, increasing the number of > measurement patches, specifying a gamma close to native response, > etc.), I still get faintly warm black values in the grayscale range > RGB(3,3,3) to about RGB(30,30,30), whether the CMM is the Windows one > or LittleCMS. The grayscale is only entirely neutral when the profile > is a single channel matrix/shaper type. > > The real, recent surprise for me was upgrading to the most up-to-date > of ArgyllCMS + Florian Hoech's dispcalGUI: I simply set-up dispGUI to > use the high-quality profiling options, D6500, gamma 2.2, the extended > patch set (just 80+ patches, I think), and to produce a 1-channel > shaper/matrix profile unattended, and when I returned from the > supermarket, the result was entirely acceptable, totally easy & > trouble-free in bringing the LCD colors to a known, usable state. > > Hats off to Graeme and Florian! The commercial vendors of > user-friendly monitor profiling packages might want to start > worrying... > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Roger Breton <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> John, >> >> Have you tried using your Spyder on another monitor, to see whether >> the instrument itself could be introducing a distortion in the >> measurements? Or try with another software? >> >> Roger >> >>> >>> Hi there, >>> >>> I have been trying to calibrate/profile my monitor with argyll. I >>> have a >>> Colorvision Spyder 2 Express. The monitor in question is a laptop >>> screen, >>> specifically it is a "Dell 15.4 WSXGA+ with TrueLife". >>> >>> Basically, my attempts have been pretty unsuccessful. Every >>> calibration I do >>> ends up having lots of magenta, such that blacks and greys on the >>> screen >>> have a distinctive colour cast. I presume this is not correct - it >>> certainly >>> doesn't make photos look very good! >>> >>> I have read about "dynamic contrast" monitors, and apparently they >>> aren't >>> any good for profiling unless you can turn it off. I can't really >>> find any very >>> technical details about the screen, and have no idea whether it >>> has "dynamic >>> contrast" or not. Also, there are no hardware controls for the >>> screen, so I >>> can't really adjust it at all before doing the calibration. Could >>> this be the >>> problem? >>> >>> Alternatively, I know my colorimeter is a pretty cheap model, so >>> perhaps it is >>> just not working very well? >>> >>> Any thoughts would be appreciated. >>> >>> Many thanks, >>> Jon Leighton >>> >> >> >> >> >