I don't get it; set up some incandescendent lamp on a fairly stable power supply which you already seem to have; put the i1 spectro in the emissive reading mode, measure the lamp, measure lamp through lens, import the spectra into a spreadsheet or use awk and divide; voilà! But you already know all of this. On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:48 AM, Iliah Borg <ib@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Dear Listmembers, > > For raw conversion, I need to decide if I'm going to use lens / filters > (polarizing filters are my primary concern) correction matrices over sensor > "profiles" or not. To make up my mind I need to take measurements of > spectral transmissions of different lenses and filters. Instrumentation I > have is: i1Pro and Spectrolino/SpectroscanT. I'm not sure I can use the lamp > in SpectroscanT (if you know it is possible please advise so), so I started > with i1Pro. > > From reading argyll/spotread documentation it seems that I can use emission > mode, measuring separately the light source as a backlit and the light from > the same source passing through the lens; than calculate the transmission > dividing the pairs of numbers for each wavelength. As far as I understand no > ambient light attachment is needed in this case. > > Another option would be to use -t flag, however only DTP41T and > SpectroScanT are listed for this flag (with the option to use Spectroscan > with a separate backlit light). Does this mode works for i1Pro too? An > attempt to run it with i1Pro caused no error messages, however the results > are different from those obtained through spotread with -e flag (might be of > course because in a quick experiment the lens was not placed to the same > position). > > Any comments and advice would be highly appreciated. > > On a side note, running spotread from Argyll CMS 1.3.3 with -p flag > /projector measurement mode/ (OS X 10.6.7) returned "unsupported for my > i1Pro. > > -- > Iliah Borg > ib@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > > >