[argyllcms] Re: Is Argyll strictly ANSI C?
- From: Frédéric Mantegazza <frederic.mantegazza@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:35:28 +0100
On vendredi 16 novembre 2007, Roger Breton wrote:
> > It doesn't use C++.
>
> Oh good. I am just not ready for OOP constructs yet.
Well, Argyll is not in C++, but *is* OO! At least, the hardware drivers
code (the only part I looked at).
--
Frédéric
http://www.gbiloba.org
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Is Argyll strictly ANSI C?
- From: Graeme Gill
- References:
- [argyllcms] Re: Is Argyll strictly ANSI C?
- From: Roger Breton
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Is Argyll strictly ANSI C?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Is Argyll strictly ANSI C?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Is Argyll strictly ANSI C?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Is Argyll strictly ANSI C?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Is Argyll strictly ANSI C?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Is Argyll strictly ANSI C?
- [argyllcms] Re: Is Argyll strictly ANSI C?
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: Is Argyll strictly ANSI C?
- From: Roger Breton