[argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- From: Kai-Uwe Behrmann <ku.b@xxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 09:52:22 +0200 (CEST)
Am 08.08.07, 11:25 +0200 schrieb Lars Tore Gustavsen:
> The resulting tif file looks very similar to the Step-21-gray.tif
> provided with qtr, but as a bonus I now had a ti2 file. I opened this
> file in photoprint, since cinepaint have problems printing grayscale
> images, printed it (with option "uncorrected") and measured it.
You'd have to convert to Rgb by hand in CinePaint.
> gutenprint 100.00 1.827 12.54 -3.70 1.19
> gutenprint density+10 100.00 1.893 11.12 -2.68 -0.53
Can you verify that you have not just a K only print and CMY is involved.
You would perhaps need a strong magnifying glass to see something.
> windows abw 100.00 2.421 3.42 -0.11 -0.22
> windows "no color" 100.00 2.122 6.83 -0.36 -0.27
> Am I right in guessing that I should lower this value before I try to
> profile my printer? I guess it most be at least possible to match the
> normal windows driver with lab 6.83.
Sounds reasonable. Not shure how lustre looks like. The relation of the
Gutenprint to the windows L value is what I see from a pure K compared
with a 100 60 0 100 rich black colour patch on glossy with K3 inks
L*16.9 -> L*5.8 (including strong colour casts).
> Maybe this topic about deep blacks is a b&w issue? Or is a general
> printing issue?
You definately need a rich black. K only is not enough for dark patches.
Whether PhotoPrint uses CMY for Gray scale images must be checked.
Alastair ?
In CinePaint you can set each Cmyk channel for its own to verify.
A patch set of mainly poor and intermixed Cmyk ramps should suffice for
determing ink limits. Unfortunedly I did not find a option to targen for
generating the intermixed rampes. Possibly I have something overseen?
kind regards
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
--
developing for colour management
www.behrmann.name + www.oyranos.org + www.cinepaint.org
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- From: Lars Tore Gustavsen
- References:
- [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- From: Kai-Uwe Behrmann
- [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- From: Lars Tore Gustavsen
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- From: Lars Tore Gustavsen
- [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- From: Kai-Uwe Behrmann
- [argyllcms] Re: Gutenprint and ink limits.
- From: Lars Tore Gustavsen