[argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0
- From: Idea Digital Imaging <qcore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:21:12 +0000
On 9 Nov 2009, at 15:14, Idea Digital Imaging wrote:
More delicate images like the rose on the test image also lose out as the "glow" of the petals is reduced by the 1.1 gamut mapping.
I've done more of a useful test -- re-separated and proofed a live job and taken a good hard look at it in the viewing booth with a couple of the retouchers.
It's a fashion story with bright and saturated clothing and, in general everybody was pleased with the slightly more open shadows and the smoothness and detail in the saturated colours.
There was a feeling that a little more could be done to boost the saturated colours so we did a couple more conversions using Klaus's tweaked version of collink but then felt that maybe these were a little too contrasty particularly in blues and greens.
The only real concern was that we were losing saturation in delicate skin tones -- just like the glow in the petals that I mentioned above.
-- Martin Orpen Idea Digital Imaging Ltd
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0
- References:
- [argyllcms] Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0
- From: qcore
- [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0
- From: Martin Weberg
- [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0
- From: qcore
- [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0
- From: Idea Digital Imaging
- [argyllcms] Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - qcore
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Martin Weberg
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - qcore
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Klaus Karcher
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Martin Weberg
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Klaus Karcher
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - qcore
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Martin Weberg
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Klaus Karcher
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Idea Digital Imaging
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Idea Digital Imaging
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Idea Digital Imaging
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Klaus Karcher
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Idea Digital Imaging
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Idea Digital Imaging
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Klaus Karcher
- » [argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0 - Idea Digital Imaging