[argyllcms] Re: Gamut mapping problems in 1.1.0

qcore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The gamut mapping appeared to me to be working in that the separations themselves were as I expect (and love) from using Argyll -- smooth, detailed, minimised clipping etc -- but mapping to an oddly restricted version of the ISO Coated v2 gamut. 

I need a specific example to track this down, as I haven't seen
anything like this in my testing.

Graeme Gill.

Other related posts: