[argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- From: Roger Breton <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:05:55 -0400
> The 10 degree observer is from a much larger
> sample population.
>
> Graeme Gill.
So the 10 degree observer is a "better" observer than the 2 degree observer
in many respects, it would seem? I wonder how much of a relationship there
is betwee this fact and the fact the ink, plastic, textile and paint guys
all swear by the 10 degree observer in their day to day color matching
business? And it that's the case, how come the graphic arts guys are still
"living in the dark"?
Regards,
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- From: Graeme Gill
- References:
- [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- From: Graeme Gill
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- » [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: Fluorescence
- From: Graeme Gill