[argyllcms] Re: Flags for Profile
- From: "ronn kling" <ronn@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:39:54 -0400
OK, that brings me back to an error that I ran into before.
Ideally to compare this with profile maker I need to use D65 and the
observer of 1964_10. This is the command I use
profile -v -qu -i D65 -o 1964_10 camImageFile
but I get this error.
Error - Requested spectral interpretation when data not available
What, exactly, am I missing?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerhard Fuernkranz" <nospam456@xxxxxx>
To: <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 4:15 PM
Subject: [argyllcms] Re: Flags for Profile
ronn kling wrote:
I am only usinfg the -u flag
profile -v -qu -u camImageFile
I am trying to compare the same image processed with two profiles. One
created with profile Maker and the other created with argyll.
It appears from the documentation that the -u flag overrides any
intent setting flags. Am I reading this correctly?
Normally (w/o -u option) the profile command chooses the color of
unprinted paper (i.e. Dmin or GS00 patch) as media white point location
for scanner profiles. With the -u option, the media white point is
placed at D50 instead. This has the side effect that relative
colorimetric and ICC-absolute intent will give the same result. Since
D50 is outside the gamut of the calibration target, the profile will
need to extrapolate the region between Dmin and D50.
Regards,
Gerhard
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Flags for Profile
- From: Graeme Gill
- References:
- [argyllcms] Monitor profiles and their (black point?) "readability"
- From: Marco N.
- [argyllcms] Re: Monitor profiles and their (black point?) "readability"
- From: Preben Soeberg
- [argyllcms] Re: Monitor profiles and their (black point?) "readability"
- From: Marco N.
- [argyllcms] Re: Monitor profiles and their (black point?) "readability"
- From: Preben Soeberg
- [argyllcms] Re: Monitor profiles and their (black point?) "readability"
- From: Marco N.
- [argyllcms] Re: Monitor profiles and their (black point?) "readability"
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] Re: Monitor profiles and their (black point?) "readability"
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Flags for Profile
- From: ronn kling
- [argyllcms] Re: Flags for Profile
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: Flags for Profile
- From: ronn kling
- [argyllcms] Re: Flags for Profile
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Flags for Profile
- » [argyllcms] Re: Flags for Profile
- » [argyllcms] Re: Flags for Profile
- » [argyllcms] Re: Flags for Profile
- » [argyllcms] Re: Flags for Profile
- » [argyllcms] Re: Flags for Profile
ronn kling wrote:
I am only usinfg the -u flag profile -v -qu -u camImageFile I am trying to compare the same image processed with two profiles. One created with profile Maker and the other created with argyll. It appears from the documentation that the -u flag overrides any intent setting flags. Am I reading this correctly?
Normally (w/o -u option) the profile command chooses the color of unprinted paper (i.e. Dmin or GS00 patch) as media white point location for scanner profiles. With the -u option, the media white point is placed at D50 instead. This has the side effect that relative colorimetric and ICC-absolute intent will give the same result. Since D50 is outside the gamut of the calibration target, the profile will need to extrapolate the region between Dmin and D50. Regards, Gerhard
- [argyllcms] Re: Flags for Profile
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Monitor profiles and their (black point?) "readability"
- From: Marco N.
- [argyllcms] Re: Monitor profiles and their (black point?) "readability"
- From: Preben Soeberg
- [argyllcms] Re: Monitor profiles and their (black point?) "readability"
- From: Marco N.
- [argyllcms] Re: Monitor profiles and their (black point?) "readability"
- From: Preben Soeberg
- [argyllcms] Re: Monitor profiles and their (black point?) "readability"
- From: Marco N.
- [argyllcms] Re: Monitor profiles and their (black point?) "readability"
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] Re: Monitor profiles and their (black point?) "readability"
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Flags for Profile
- From: ronn kling
- [argyllcms] Re: Flags for Profile
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: Flags for Profile
- From: ronn kling
- [argyllcms] Re: Flags for Profile
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz