[argyllcms] Re: Display Calibration Hardware Capabilities

  • From: János, Tóth F. <janos666@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 01:16:35 +0100

I guess at the end of the day this speaks for the custom EDR/ccss files.
They can't cause too much trouble but we can assume a CM/i1Pro gives
better approximation of the particular display than an EDR file of a
different display (the display-to-display variation is probably higher
than the absolute error of these spectros), unless you work with the
very same displays what X-Rite used for creating the EDR files...

If one of the EIZO or NEC whic X-Rite used happen be on my desk
(///OFFTOPIC/// there is a chance for both because I happened to be
some sort of a display „reviwer” --in my little country, there is no
chance to borrow Jeti or Minolta stuff even for this „mighty” task,
LOL-- and I can ask for specific models, so why not pick those...?
:D), I will be able to compare the i1d3 results with the X-Rite EDR
and my custom ccsss files to get an idea about the final deviations.

>The impression I get is that since
> the basic filter response is closer to the standard observer anyway,
> the calibration for a particular display is somewhat less critical
> than the consumer colorimeters that preceded it.

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. argyllcms
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2012