[argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- From: Roger Breton <graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 18:32:12 -0400
Hi Rolf,
> what for are you using the -c2 option.
> The DTP94 is an USB instrument and should work
> without that option.
This happens when I run dispcal without the -c2 option:
> G4:~ rogerbreton$ dispcal -v -m -yl -t5000 -b95 -gl -e caltest
> Setting up the instrument
> Instrument Type: Eye-One Pro
> Serial Number: 102242
> Firmware version: 101
> CPLD version: 101
> Date manufactured: 30-4-2002
> U.V. filter ?: No
> Measure Ambient ?: No
> Tot. Measurement Count: 33915
> Remission Spot Count: 6369
> Remission Scan Count: 1020
> Date of last Remission spot cal: Tue Mar 27 19:21:52 2007
> Remission Spot Count at last cal: 6367
> Total lamp usage: 7555.877930
> RegisterProcess failed (error = -50)
> Abort trap
You see, dispcal resorts to my EyeOnePro. I guess that's OK. But I am still
trapped with the RegisterProcess failed error :(
MfG,
Roger Breton | Laval, Canada | graxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://pages.infinit.net/graxx
- References:
- [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- From: Rolf Gierling
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal fails
- From: Rolf Gierling