[argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed?
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:23:31 +1000
Gerhard Fuernkranz wrote:
another though coming into my mind is do display an image with RGB patches
[254,255,255] [255,254,255] [255,255,254]
[253,255,255] [255,253,255] [255,255,253]
[252,255,255] [255,252,255] [255,255,252]
[251,255,255] [255,251,255] [255,255,251]
etc.
on a white background. As long as no clipping occurs, the color of each
patch should differ from the white background surrounding the patch.
This would avoid the need to perform measurements; the test image can be
displayed statically and judged visually. The problem is however, I can
indeed measure a difference between e.g. RGB [254,255,255] and
[255,255,255], but my eyes cannot distinguish this difference - so the
One way of solving this might be a wedge with a superimposed visual texture
that modulates the wedge. The idea is that in saturation the
texture disappears. The texture might be a different shape for +ve and
-ve modulation, so that it's easier to see a change when one side
of the modulation is clipped.
cheers,
Graeme.
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Problem with website?
- From: howdy555
- [argyllcms] Problem with website?
- References:
- [argyllcms] Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed?
- From: Alastair M. Robinson
- [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed?
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed?
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
- [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed?
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed?
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
- [argyllcms] Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed?
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Gerhard Fuernkranz
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Gerhard Fuernkranz
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Gerhard Fuernkranz
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Roger
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Gerhard Fuernkranz
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Gerhard Fuernkranz
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Gerhard Fuernkranz
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Graeme Gill