[argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed?
- From: "Alastair M. Robinson" <profiling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:11:16 +0100
Hi, Gerhard Fuernkranz wrote:
Alastair, is this problem reproducible, or sporadic?
I'm not sure yet - not had much time to explore it yet.I did take a few readings (with a DTP94, linear LUT and the same monitor settings as had led to this error message) with a target comprising just the top end of the greyscale - here are the readings:
NUMBER_OF_SETS 12 BEGIN_DATA 1 95.276 95.276 95.276 89.871 98.192 136.72 2 95.669 95.669 95.669 90.191 98.443 136.52 3 96.063 96.063 96.063 90.544 98.826 136.01 4 96.457 96.457 96.457 90.883 99.170 135.39 5 96.850 96.850 96.850 91.320 99.484 135.21 6 97.244 97.244 97.244 91.659 99.676 135.06 7 97.638 97.638 97.638 92.180 99.980 135.06 8 98.031 98.031 98.031 92.209 99.985 135.05 9 98.425 98.425 98.425 92.200 99.971 135.04 10 98.819 98.819 98.819 92.209 99.980 135.05 11 99.213 99.213 99.213 92.200 99.990 135.03 12 99.606 99.606 99.606 92.214 99.985 135.06 END_DATA Note some reversals in there.I also found that if I leave the monitor's "Brightness" control at its default setting, and just use "Contrast" (which on this particular monitor appears to be a straightforward scaling pivoted about black) to make the overall brightness bearable the calibration completes without error.
Which of the three error messages did you get?
* "Inverting Jacobian failed (3)"
[ I suspect, it was (3)? ]
It was indeed (3). All the best, -- Alastair M. Robinson
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed?
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
- [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed?
- References:
- [argyllcms] Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed?
- From: Alastair M. Robinson
- [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed?
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed?
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
- [argyllcms] Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed?
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Gerhard Fuernkranz
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Gerhard Fuernkranz
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Gerhard Fuernkranz
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Roger
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Gerhard Fuernkranz
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Gerhard Fuernkranz
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Gerhard Fuernkranz
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Alastair M. Robinson
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Graeme Gill
- » [argyllcms] Re: Dispcal - Inverting Jacobian failed? - Graeme Gill