> Over time, you'd wind up with a profile built from tens of > thousands of samples, all drawn from the actual images being > printed. Plus, you wouldn't have to spend the time it takes to > create a profile from such a large sample set all at once -- after > all, adding a few minutes to the time of making a special print > isn't that significant, but spending an entire day creating and > reading a dozens-of-thousands sample chart would be most annoying. Very nice idea if the output device would never drift. Which is never the case. The normal drift over time of any inkjet printer (which is actually a compound of device drifts, plus ink and media batch tolerances), would introduce an error that would render this procedure less accurate than just generating a standard profile of a thousand patches or so. My guess. -- Roberto Michelena Infinitek Lima, Peru