[argyllcms] Re: Different applications & renderings
- From: Benjamin B <benjamin_b@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 19:08:50 +1300
Thanks Magnus.
> Are you sure that Gimp really use the colorprofile? I don't trust
> just click the use systemprofile-button. And I know that before
> RawTherapee couldn't use that on Linux. I don't know if RT have
> solved that yet. I always point my applications to the icc-file.
> Have you chose the same colorimetric rendering - perceptual, relative
> o dyl - for your aplications.
Yes I point them all to the same icc file. Same rendering too, relative
colorimetric, where I can set it. I don't have them use a system profile.
RawTherapee doesn't have an option to use the system profile, so I point
it to the same specific one.
Anyway I have now compared all four applications and the result is
shocking:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/805/cmall.png/
They all (still) render the image differently.
> I haven't got Firefox to work with my massive XYZLUT+MTX-profile.
> Therefor RawTherapee, Geeqie and Gimp shows the same but
> Firefox/Iceweasel sucks.
What exactly does it mean that you didn't get FF to work?
Reckon I should talk to the respective application people?
Cheers
Benjamin
> 2011-12-21 12:57, Benjamin B skrev:
> > So I use four applications: rawtherapee, geeqie, gimp and firefox.
> >
> > Today I found that, although they should all be using the same
> > colour profile, the colours are vastly different.
> >
> > Screen shot: http://img716.imageshack.us/img716/9096/92422937.png
> >
> > Geeqie and rawtherapee are pretty close. Gimp is far off. Firefox
> > looks the same as gimp.
Other related posts:
