[argyllcms] Re: Device link gamut mapping: how to do it right?
- From: Nikolay Pokhilchenko <nikolay_po@xxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:02:23 +0400
I have doing linking with perceptual intent after "tiffgamut -ia -pj". I've
noticed that the result of that linking is white point mismatch between source
and destination gamuts, which seen in checking *.wrl. The source image profile
was sRGB, destination profile was printer profile for A-type illuminant.
While run "tiffgamut -ir -pj" before collink, there is other result - no white
point mismatch in diagnostic *.wrl.
But I cannot distinguish the difference between profiles and output TIFFs with
different -i keys in tiffgamut! The results are rather good, interdependent of
tiffgamut -i key.
I can't understand how must I do linking the best way, with what keys...
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Device link gamut mapping: how to do it right?
- From: Graeme Gill
- References:
- [argyllcms] Re: Device link gamut mapping: how to do it right?
- From: Klaus Karcher
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Device link gamut mapping: how to do it right?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Device link gamut mapping: how to do it right?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Device link gamut mapping: how to do it right?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Device link gamut mapping: how to do it right?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Device link gamut mapping: how to do it right?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Device link gamut mapping: how to do it right?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Device link gamut mapping: how to do it right?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Device link gamut mapping: how to do it right?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Device link gamut mapping: how to do it right?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Device link gamut mapping: how to do it right?
- [argyllcms] Re: Device link gamut mapping: how to do it right?
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: Device link gamut mapping: how to do it right?
- From: Klaus Karcher