Ben Goren wrote:
Is it safe to assume that the wtpt tag of an ICC profile is the actual paper color?
Not really. The white point can be anything the profile creator decides to put in there.
An Argyll-made profile of Red River Premium Matte paper, on the other hand, has a wtpt tag of X=0.859, Y=0.896, Z=0.849. According to Bruce, that's L=95.8, a=-0.920, b=-9.09. According to spotread from a sheet from a different batch from what I used to make the profile, the paper measures X=86, Y=89, Z=78 or L=95, a=1.6, b=-4.2. Not exactly the same, but certainly in the same ballpark. And it looks about right when I fill the screen with those values in Photoshop.
The Argyll printer profile white point is typically close to, but not quite the same as the white test patches. This is because the test points are modeled with some degree of smoothing. The white point that ends up in the profile is taken from the smoothed model value of no colorant (subtractive) or full colorant (additive). You can make them closer by adding more white test patches to the test chart, which will weight that more in the smoothed model.
So...is the Crane Museo Max paper really that pinkish? Or is their profile somehow b0rked? Or...?
Any of the above. The only sure way is to measure the paper. Graeme Gill.