[argyllcms] Re: DTP94 problem
- From: edmund ronald <edmundronald@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 17:15:39 +0100
Of course many of these instrumment issues could be solved if
instrumentation were standardised. Too bad the ICC is not any more a
standardisation committee.
Edmund
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Fabrizio Levati
<fabrizio.levati@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Graeme,
> Quato support sent back my instrument saying that "the device was checked on
> several computers with many calibrations on several days and showed no
> problems. All the calibrations were ok also when compared with other
> devices." Obviously they did't use toolcrib to check the issue I reported...
>
> Is there a way to compile dispcal and dispread in a way that the initial
> reset error will be ignored?
>
> I badly need to use this instrument to compare results with other
> instrument/software combination.
>
> Thanks
> Fabrizio
>
>
> Il 09/12/10 13.54, "Graeme Gill" <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
>
>> Fabrizio Levati wrote:
>>> I owe you a beer... At least!
>>
>> No worries. You can also try sending it a "SD" command,
>> and yours should return "NaN" rather than the floating
>> point value. You can use "CE" to clear the error after
>> the "0PR".
>>
>> Graeme Gill.
>>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
