[argyllcms] Re: DIY probe
- From: "Frédéric Mantegazza" <frederic.mantegazza@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:17:09 +0200
Le 22/8/2007, "Graeme Gill" <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit:
>No, I've not had the opportunity to use it on a projector, although
>I imagine it will work best in that sort of application, since that
>was what it was designed for. I really think that if you're going to
>go to the trouble of calibrating, it's worth the couple of hundred
>dollars price difference between a DIY instrument and a commercial
>instrument for the flexibility of being able to calibrate displays,
>and the assurance that the instrument has been calibrated against
>traceable standards for colorimetric and absolute brightness accuracy.
>
>I think the HCFR project is a fine effort, but it would have to
>take a step up with a version 2 using a different sensor, to
>play both in the monitor calibration and home cinema game.
If I can compile your developpement version of Argyllcms, I will make
tests with a beamer.
- References:
- [argyllcms] Re: DIY probe
- From: Graeme Gill
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] DIY probe
- » [argyllcms] Re: DIY probe
- » [argyllcms] Re: DIY probe
- » [argyllcms] Re: DIY probe
- » [argyllcms] Re: DIY probe
- » [argyllcms] Re: DIY probe
- » [argyllcms] Re: DIY probe
- » [argyllcms] Re: DIY probe
- [argyllcms] Re: DIY probe
- From: Graeme Gill