[argyllcms] Re: Colprof feature request: amount of black pointhue correction control
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz <nospam456@xxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:13:44 +0200
Nikolay Pokhilchenko wrote:
> Take a look to .ti3 attached.
I find for instance this huge divergence "interesting":
$ colprof -v -qh -S sRGB.icm LSM2484
$ xicclu -s255 -fif -ir LSM2484.icc
0 0 0
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 [Lab] -> Lut -> 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
[RGB] (clip)
$ xicclu -s255 -fb -ir LSM2484.icc
0 0 0
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 [Lab] -> Lut -> 30.935831 23.114864 0.000001
[RGB]
$ xicclu -s255 -ff -ir LSM2484.icc
0 0 0
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 [RGB] -> Lut -> 12.068596 -0.064363 -8.293796
[Lab]
30.935831 23.114864 0.000001
30.935831 23.114864 0.000001 [RGB] -> Lut -> 19.881831 0.965791
-1.891457 [Lab]
=> that's a difference of about 10 delta E !
[Btw, looking at the measurements, I find this RGB printer driver not
too well-behaved in dark regions - possibly the generation of CMYK
separations from RGB is not optimally tuned for the used inks/paper. It
seems to put down too much cyan and magenta ink (and/or not enough
yellow ink) for RGB=[0,0,0]. Just wondering, is this the driver provided
by the printer vendor, using original inks/paper from the printer
vendor? Did you tweak any driver settings? (e.g. increase cyan/magenta
density)]
Regards,
Gerhard
Other related posts: