[argyllcms] Re: Centralize the definition to use UCMM

  • From: Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 09:39:46 +0100

On 9 August 2010 06:55, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I know you've slightly renamed your version, but something in the package
> description, or that shows up on package installation indicating what
> functionality is missing or (possibly) suspect/untested should be enough.

How about this:

+This packaged version is Hargyllcms, which is a friendly fork of Argyllcms,
+but does come with the following caveats:
+
+ * Internal versions of jcnf, libusb and libtiff are removed and system
+   versions are used. This may cause some instruments that worked with the
+   modified internal library versions to not work with the system versions.
+ * The UCMM functionality has been removed due to incompatible jcnf versions.
+ * It's recomended you check with the "official" version of argyll available
+   from http://www.argyllcms.com/ before reporting bugs upstream.

Richard.

Other related posts: