[argyllcms] Re: Can Eye-one Pro failure the calibration?
- From: "Marco N." <gialandra@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:09:38 +0200
Could it be due to display laziness to change from white to black?
Marco
Il giorno 04/ott/2010, alle ore 18.40, Gerhard Fürnkranz ha scritto:
>
> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>> Datum: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:13:23 +0100
>> Von: Sam Berry <samkberry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> An: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Betreff: [argyllcms] Re: Can Eye-one Pro failure the calibration?
>
>> 1 100.00 100.00 100.00 95.258 100.00 110.48
>> 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1302 1.2085 1.4144
>> 3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.23034 0.23823 0.34519
>> 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.17494 0.17618 0.28211
>> 5 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.14918 0.15182 0.26038
>> 6 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.14060 0.14670 0.25351
>> 7 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.11794 0.12608 0.24686
>>
>> I can't explain patch 2's odd result,
>
> I'm wondering whether this might be some kind of "image lag" (i.e. some
> information left over from the previous white reading)? Is it reproducible at
> each white -> black transition? [the numbers above suggest that it takes a
> couple of subsequent black readings until they converge towards a constant
> value +/- random nose]
>
> Regards,
> Gerhard
>
> --
> Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief!
> Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail
>
Other related posts:
