[argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- From: Ben Goren <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 18:12:39 -0700
On 2008 May 27, at 3:29 PM, Guy K. Kloss wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2008 9:43:01 am Ben Goren wrote:
Ah, well. Perhaps I'll try again if I can find a ColorChecker SG to
borrow.
You may want to have a look at the charts by Christophe Métairie
Photographie
[1]. The "DigitaL TargeT 003" with 285 colour patches is made as a
replacement for the pricey GretagMacbeth Digital ColorChecker SG for
digital
photography. And it costs only EUR 92, so it is significantly
cheaper. It is
printed in a non-glare way, so it would get rid of some of your
glare issues.
Thanks for the tip. That's more than I want to spend right now, but
not so much more that it'll hurt if I wind up doing a lot of this stuff.
Have you had any luck using his target with Argyll?
Cheers,
b&
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- From: Guy K. Kloss
- References:
- [argyllcms] Camera profiling?
- From: Ben Goren
- [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- From: Ben Goren
- [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- From: Ben Goren
- [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- From: Guy K. Kloss
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Camera profiling?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
On Wed, 28 May 2008 9:43:01 am Ben Goren wrote:
Ah, well. Perhaps I'll try again if I can find a ColorChecker SG to borrow.
You may want to have a look at the charts by Christophe Métairie Photographie
[1]. The "DigitaL TargeT 003" with 285 colour patches is made as areplacement for the pricey GretagMacbeth Digital ColorChecker SG for digital photography. And it costs only EUR 92, so it is significantly cheaper. It is printed in a non-glare way, so it would get rid of some of your glare issues.
- [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- From: Guy K. Kloss
- [argyllcms] Camera profiling?
- From: Ben Goren
- [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- From: Ben Goren
- [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- From: Ben Goren
- [argyllcms] Re: Camera profiling?
- From: Guy K. Kloss