[argyllcms] Re: Calibrating the DTP94

Roger Breton wrote:


Now, it looks like the i1D2 has the capabilities I am looking for. So, on to
X-Rite for the follow up for the i1D2 SDK. We'll see what they say.


The sequel library that the eye-one sdk uses, has capabilities to set
calibration matrices, but I don't think these are exposed by the
eye-one sdk itself.


But, how feasible, in your opinion, would the idea of post-correcting the
monitor profile with an abstract profile grafted on the original monitor
profile be feasible?


It's kind of clumsy. The abstract profile stuff in Argyll isn't
really intended for such a thing. It would make far more sense
to add a correction in the driver to the XYZ values.

Before jumping to conclusions though, how would you characterize
the errors between the DTP94 and the CS-100 ? If you scaled the
XYZ values to make the white points agree, how much in
error would other colors be ?

Graeme Gill.

Other related posts: