Le 13/12/2007, "Graeme Gill" <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit: >> Ok. Do I also need to patch dispcal? or is this function used by both >> dispwin and dispcal programs? > >It's common code, but since I imagine the photo frame doesn't >have Video LUTs, dispcal not going to be relevant. Yes, you're right! >The idea would be to just make a profile, and then use >something like imdi/cctiff to transform the raster images. That was my idea. -- Frédéric