[argyllcms] Re: [Bulk] Re: Huey and dispcal
- From: Tommaso Schiavinotto <mynos_main@xxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 23:31:56 +0200
I got the new device, the serial device was != -1 and argyllcms
did not complain (the version that checks on the sn!=0xffffffff).
So Argyll did not break the Huey, as expected. :)
Now I just have to learn how to use it, the hard part.
Thanks everybody for the support.
--Tommaso
Graeme Gill wrote:
> Tommaso Schiavinotto wrote:
>> I have some news, an operator of the support told me that they are going
>> to replace the device after having me asked to run a windows program to
>> obtain the serial number (that was -1, as in Argycms).
>
> Interesting.
>
>> They asked me as soon I get the new device to run the program for
>> getting the serial number in Windows and only after using Argyllcms.
>> They told me that they want to be sure argyllcms is not going to rewrite
>> the EEPROM. Althought they admit this would be the first report of such
>> a kind.
>
> It would be a strange incident if Argyll had written the serial number,
> given that although there is code in the driver to write the EEPROM,
> it is not called by anything. In fact a smart code optimizer would
> leave the code out of the object file...
>
> cheers,
> Graeme Gill.
>
>
Other related posts:
