[argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- From: Klaus Karcher <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 22:58:55 +0200
Ben Goren wrote:
On 2008 Jun 1, at 3:13 AM, Klaus Karcher wrote:
You can also compare wood measurements taken in close proximity to get
a sense of the variances.
I tried that this morning, too. Even a millimeter made a significant
difference, especially on oak. Indeed, the variation in sample location
is almost enough for different woods to have an overlapping range of Lab
values....
Ok -- I think there's nothing else for it but to take a large number of
measurements for each kind of wood and average them to get an indication
for the "mean" color. As the lightness varies very much with the angle,
the a/b coordinates are more meaningful. You can also draw the a/b
values of all your readings in a scatterplot and look for marked-off
"clouds" for different kinds of wood.
BTW: the i1 uses 45/0° geometry (illumination at 45 degrees to the
sample's normal and measurement on the sample's normal). Even though the
illumination should be approximately circular, it's a good idea to
rotate the sample or measurement device amongst the measurements to get
better averages.
Klaus
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- From: Ben Goren
- References:
- [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- From: Alastair M. Robinson
- [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- From: Ben Goren
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- » [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
On 2008 Jun 1, at 3:13 AM, Klaus Karcher wrote:
You can also compare wood measurements taken in close proximity to get a sense of the variances.
I tried that this morning, too. Even a millimeter made a significant difference, especially on oak. Indeed, the variation in sample location is almost enough for different woods to have an overlapping range of Lab values....
- [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- From: Ben Goren
- [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- From: Alastair M. Robinson
- [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] Re: Best way to proceed?
- From: Ben Goren