[argyllcms] Re: Awful result with Argyll 1.3.5 + dispcalGUI 0.8 + i1Display Pro & Dell U2711 :-(((
- From: Paolo Avezzano <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 20:32:24 +0100
Time to take photos to current RGB settings and give a try!
I found a new meaning for "Never Ending Story" :)
I'm still not fond of matrix instead of LUT, but it does cost nothing, doesn't
it?
With "Service Menu" for the WP, do you mean those standard/cool/warm preset on
OSD menu?
Regards,
Paolo
On 14/gen/2012, at 19:03, János, Tóth F. wrote:
> Seriously, why don't you even try to calibrate the Standard mode?
> It's the most precise and correct picture mode on these displays.
>
> You don't really need RGB Gain controls. Both your VGA LUT or your CMS
> engine can take care of the white point (with the appropriate settings
> for either or both the calibration and/or rendering). But if you wish
> to set the WP with hardware controls then you can do so from the
> Service Menu (I preferred this solution myself when I had an U2410: WP
> from the SM, LUT calibration to native WP target, gamma closest to the
> native response, matrix+gamma profile, absolute colorimetric rendering
> intent).
>
> If you calibrate the Standard mode, a basic gamma + matrix profile
> will be sufficient to achieve dE2000<1 and this profile will be
> compatible with every CMS engines (it will also help to avoid the
> possible problems with the blac point compensation).
>
> The Custom mode has problems with the color mixture (it's not
> additive, no matter how you set it up with the triaxial
> primaries+secondaries controls).
> A cLUT profile may correct these anomalies but what's the point if you
> have a Standard mode without anomalies?
>
> Also, the contrast ratio was the highest in Standard mode, as well as
> the relative precision (banding-free gray gradient, even after the
> corrections).
>
> 2012/1/14, Fabrizio Giudici <Fabrizio.Giudici@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 15:28:23 +0100, Fabrizio Giudici
>> <Fabrizio.Giudici@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> In any case, with this round the profile to use is the one with
>>> colorprof -v -qu -ni -no -as
>>
>> Correction: -v -qu -ni -no -ag ! The stupid Mac OS X Display preference
>> panel clips profile names and seems to be inconsistent when you hover with
>> the mouse, so a tooltip shows the complete name. When I delete the three
>> discarded profiles, I found that the best one was different than I
>> believed.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager
>> Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."
>> fabrizio.giudici@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://tidalwave.it - http://fabriziogiudici.it
>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
