[argyllcms] Re: Averaging measurements
- From: "Martin Weberg" <martin.weberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 23:33:45 +0200
2008/4/22 Gerhard Fuernkranz:
> One possible way is, that you don't actually average them, but that you
> simply form the union of the two measurement sets, and let "profile" do
> the averaging (i.e. if you have two .ti3 files with 1000 measured
> samples each, create a .ti3 containing all 2000 readings, and use this
> combined .ti3 to build the profile).
I tried it and it does not take that much time.
I pasted the columns and changed number of patches from 1680 to 3360:
NUMBER_OF_SETS 3360
BEGIN_DATA
1 "AM28" 100.00 100.00 100.00 ...
...
1680 "AC3" 94.349 14.640 11.943 ...
1 "AM28" 100.00 100.00 100.00 ...
...
1680 "AC3" 94.349 14.640 11.943 ...
END_DATA
Is this right, or do I have to alter something else too?
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Averaging measurements
- From: Graeme Gill
- References:
- [argyllcms] Averaging measurements
- From: Martin Weberg
- [argyllcms] Re: Averaging measurements
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Averaging measurements
- » [argyllcms] Re: Averaging measurements
- » [argyllcms] Re: Averaging measurements
- » [argyllcms] Re: Averaging measurements
- » [argyllcms] Re: Averaging measurements
- » [argyllcms] Re: Averaging measurements
- » [argyllcms] Re: Averaging measurements
- » [argyllcms] Re: Averaging measurements
- » [argyllcms] Re: Averaging measurements
- » [argyllcms] Re: Averaging measurements
- » [argyllcms] Re: Averaging measurements
- [argyllcms] Re: Averaging measurements
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Averaging measurements
- From: Martin Weberg
- [argyllcms] Re: Averaging measurements
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz