[argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS Version 0.52 Released
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 05:33:00 +1100
Gerhard Fuernkranz wrote:
do you really mean *both*, better smoothness *and* better fit?
Isn't that rather a trade-off?
Yes, but that's the way it appears. It just means that It wasn't
close to the actual (smoothness * fit) limit line before.
Of course it's still early days in seeing whether the resulting
profiles act/look any differently/better/worse than the ones
generated by the previous release.
Graeme.
- References:
- [argyllcms] ArgyllCMS Version 0.52 Released
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS Version 0.52 Released
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] ArgyllCMS Version 0.52 Released
- » [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS Version 0.52 Released
- » [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS Version 0.52 Released
- » [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS Version 0.52 Released
- » [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS Version 0.52 Released
- » [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS Version 0.52 Released
- » [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS Version 0.52 Released
- » [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS Version 0.52 Released
do you really mean *both*, better smoothness *and* better fit? Isn't that rather a trade-off?
Yes, but that's the way it appears. It just means that It wasn't close to the actual (smoothness * fit) limit line before.
- [argyllcms] ArgyllCMS Version 0.52 Released
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS Version 0.52 Released
- From: Gerhard Fuernkranz