On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Pascal de Bruijn <pmjdebruijn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Pascal de Bruijn wrote: >> >>> However, please do note, I did include a small patch, to extra smooth >>> the shapers... >> >> Hi, >> I'm not very happy about the idea that there is something >> called "ArgyllCMS 1.1.0 RC2" out there that doesn't actually behave >> exactly like ArgyllCMS 1.1.0 RC2. Could you provide the test case(s) that >> prompted this change (or point them out to me) please ? Did you notice >> that I made a change in this area (xicc/xfit.c) between RC1 and RC2 ? >> How did that affect your test case(s) ? > > It definately worked well for 1.0.3/4... > > It's just the XBASE_SHAPE times 10... > > Anyway, I always clearly tag my packages with my nickname, and provide > a decent changelog. Small note: I'm currently patching argyll because I can't control shaper smoothness via a commandline parameter. When 1.1.0 is released I plan to do a argyll-release PPA, with an unmodified build... Regards, Pascal de Bruijn