On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2009/11/6 Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> At very long last I've uploaded ArgyllCMS V1.1.0 RC1 (Release Candidate 1) >> to the website to give interested people some time to test and report any >> bugs or problems. If there is not too much wrong with it, my intention is >> to make V1.1.0 the current stable release in about two weeks. > > The release indeed looks good. I am slightly worried, building a > product on top of ArgyllCMS, where: > > * It's using jam, and the automake build system isn't in the tree > * A heavily hacked up local version of libusb is present > * No public CVS, SVN or git tree is available > * The licence has just changed, and the project has multiple licences > > The source file is _very_ difficult to build on Linux for > distributions such as Fedora. > > The alternative would be for one of us distro folk to "fork" > ArgyllCMS, add the automake build files and enable the system wide > libusb, and then release it as > SpecialVersionOfArgyllCMSForDistros-1.1.0.tar.gz. It would then be a > case of just updating the few source files whenever you do an upstream > release in the future. This isn't something that _I_ want to do > (unless you think it's a good idea...), as I think it would hurt > ArgyllCMS upstream. This sortof already has been done by Roland Mas: http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/a/argyll/argyll_1.0.4-1.diff.gz Regards, Pascal de Bruijn