[argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS V1.0.3 Released
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 09:34:58 +1000
Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
This appears as the used libtiff would be quite a bit older?
Yes, if the built in libtiff is used, it is not the latest and greatest
libtiff version. I was thinking of updating it when libtiff 4 gets released.
Graeme Gill.
- References:
- [argyllcms] ArgyllCMS V1.0.3 Released
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS V1.0.3 Released
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS V1.0.3 Released
- From: Kai-Uwe Behrmann
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] ArgyllCMS V1.0.3 Released
- » [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS V1.0.3 Released
- » [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS V1.0.3 Released
- » [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS V1.0.3 Released
- » [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS V1.0.3 Released
- » [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS V1.0.3 Released
- » [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS V1.0.3 Released
This appears as the used libtiff would be quite a bit older?
- [argyllcms] ArgyllCMS V1.0.3 Released
- From: Graeme Gill
- [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS V1.0.3 Released
- From: Klaus Karcher
- [argyllcms] Re: ArgyllCMS V1.0.3 Released
- From: Kai-Uwe Behrmann