[argyllcms] Re: Adobe BPC (maybe OT?)
- From: Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:58:15 +1000
Bill Morse wrote:
This may be OT, but for those of us who have not yet made the jump to
Argyll, could you apply these thoughts to profile creation in other
packages, say ColorGPS (by ErgoSoft) or Colorburst?
Hard to comment, since I've never used these products. The
literature about them doesn't give much away as far as what they
are supposed to do, and in any case, the only way of separating
claims from reality with these things, is to put them to the test.
The impression I get is that the most widely trusted profiling
packages used by serious users (for instance, the color consultants
that frequent the Apple ColorSync list), are Gretag Profile Maker,
and X-Rite Monaco.
Graeme Gill.
- Follow-Ups:
- [argyllcms] Re: Adobe BPC (maybe OT?)
- From: Roger Breton
- References:
- [argyllcms] Re: Adobe BPC (maybe OT?)
- From: Bill Morse
Other related posts:
- » [argyllcms] Re: Adobe BPC (maybe OT?)
- » [argyllcms] Re: Adobe BPC (maybe OT?)
- » [argyllcms] Re: Adobe BPC (maybe OT?)
This may be OT, but for those of us who have not yet made the jump to Argyll, could you apply these thoughts to profile creation in other packages, say ColorGPS (by ErgoSoft) or Colorburst?
Hard to comment, since I've never used these products. The literature about them doesn't give much away as far as what they are supposed to do, and in any case, the only way of separating claims from reality with these things, is to put them to the test.
- [argyllcms] Re: Adobe BPC (maybe OT?)
- From: Roger Breton
- [argyllcms] Re: Adobe BPC (maybe OT?)
- From: Bill Morse