[argyllcms] Re: A few questions + an idea for spyd2.c (this time even more useless than before!)
- From: howdy555@xxxxxxxxx
- To: Graeme Gill <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:35:03 +0100
If anyone has missed the excellent Nikolay's testing workflow:
//www.freelists.org/post/argyllcms/A-few-questions-an-idea-for-spyd2c-this-time-even-more-useless-than-before,3
//www.freelists.org/post/argyllcms/A-few-questions-an-idea-for-spyd2c-this-time-even-more-useless-than-before,4
>> This would also make a good addition to the documentation which does
>> not tell anything about the sensible range of DE
> It's very variable, depending on the details. Some well behaved devices
> may give averages < 1 and peaks < 2, while things like xerographic printers
> might be average 6, peak 15
That is exactly what I was thinking about! This sentence would make a perfect
addition to the help file!
> [...]so it's hard to give much guidance.
You have just given an excellent one :).
> I was going to look into some details, such as when the transcnt or
> intclks is zero, and whether is is some integration time that guarantees
> at least two transitions.
Please pay close attention to sensv[4] :)
> There are some affordable and quite good charts available,
> and US$10 is not that expensive: <http://www.targets.coloraid.de/>,
Are these fully supprted by Argyll?
Other related posts:
